skip to main content
Resource type Show Results with: Show Results with: Search type Index

Tools for translational neuroscience: PTSD is associated with heightened fear responses using acoustic startle but not skin conductance measures

Glover, Ebony M ; Phifer, Justine E ; Crain, Daniel F ; Norrholm, Seth D ; Davis, Michael ; Bradley, Bekh ; Ressler, Kerry J ; Jovanovic, Tanja

Depression and anxiety, 2011-12, Vol.28 (12), p.1058-1066

Hoboken: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company

Full text available online

Citations Cited by
  • Title:
    Tools for translational neuroscience: PTSD is associated with heightened fear responses using acoustic startle but not skin conductance measures
  • Author/Creator: Glover, Ebony M ; Phifer, Justine E ; Crain, Daniel F ; Norrholm, Seth D ; Davis, Michael ; Bradley, Bekh ; Ressler, Kerry J ; Jovanovic, Tanja
  • Publisher: Hoboken: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company
  • Language: English
  • Subjects: trauma ; psychophysiology ; posttraumatic stress disorders ; skin conductance response ; fear‐potentiated startle ; Severity of Illness Index ; Humans ; Middle Aged ; African Americans ; Male ; Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic - physiopathology ; Fear - physiology ; Conditioning, Classical - physiology ; Neuropsychological Tests ; Neurosciences - methods ; Adult ; Female ; Galvanic Skin Response - physiology ; Translational Medical Research - methods ; Reflex, Startle - physiology ; s ; fear-potentiated startle
  • Is Part Of: Depression and anxiety, 2011-12, Vol.28 (12), p.1058-1066
  • Description: Background: Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) patients show heightened fear responses to trauma reminders and an inability to inhibit fear in the presence of safety reminders. Brain imaging studies suggest that this is in part due to amygdala over‐reactivity as well as deficient top‐down cortical inhibition of the amygdala. Consistent with these findings, previous studies, using fear‐potentiated startle (FPS), have shown exaggerated startle and deficits in fear inhibition in PTSD participants. However, many PTSD studies using the skin conductance response (SCR) report no group differences in fear acquisition. Method: The study included 41 participants with PTSD and 70 without PTSD. The fear conditioning session included a reinforced conditioned stimulus (CS+, danger cue) paired with an aversive airblast, and a nonreinforced conditioned stimulus (CS−, safety cue). Acoustic startle responses and SCR were acquired during the presentation of each CS. Results: The results showed that fear conditioned responses were captured in both the FPS and SCR measures. Furthermore, PTSD participants had higher FPS to the danger cue and safety cue compared to trauma controls. However, SCR did not differ between groups. Finally, we found that FPS to the danger cue predicted re‐experiencing symptoms, whereas FPS to the safety cue predicted hyper‐arousal symptoms. However, SCR did not contribute to PTSD symptom variance. Conclusions: Replicating earlier studies, we showed increased FPS in PTSD participants. However, although SCR was a good measure of differential conditioning, it did not differentiate between PTSD groups. These data suggest that FPS may be a useful tool for translational research. Depression and Anxiety, 2011.  © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
  • Notes: The authors disclose the following financial relationships within the past 3 years: Contract grant sponsor: IRACDA; Contract grant number: K12-GM000680; Contract grant sponsor: NIH/NIGMS; Contract grant number: R01-MH071537; Contract grant sponsor: NIH National Centers for Research Resources; Contract grant number: M01 RR00039; Contract grant sponsor: NIH/NIMH, Emory and Grady Memorial Hospital General Clinic Research Center.
  • Identifier: ISSN: 1091-4269
    EISSN: 1520-6394
    DOI: 10.1002/da.20880
    PMID: 21898707