skip to main content
Resource type Show Results with: Show Results with: Search type Index

Outcome modelling strategies in epidemiology: traditional methods and basic alternatives

Greenland, Sander ; Daniel, Rhian ; Pearce, Neil

International Journal of Epidemiology, 2016, Vol.45(2), p.565-575 [Peer Reviewed Journal]

Full text available online

Citations Cited by
  • Title:
    Outcome modelling strategies in epidemiology: traditional methods and basic alternatives
  • Author/Creator: Greenland, Sander ; Daniel, Rhian ; Pearce, Neil
  • Subjects: Education Corner
  • Is Part Of: International Journal of Epidemiology, 2016, Vol.45(2), p.565-575
  • Description: Abstract Controlling for too many potential confounders can lead to or aggravate problems of data sparsity or multicollinearity, particularly when the number of covariates is large in relation to the study size. As a result, methods to reduce the number of modelled covariates are often deployed. We review several traditional modelling strategies, including stepwise regression and the ‘change-in-estimate’ (CIE) approach to deciding which potential confounders to include in an outcome-regression model for estimating effects of a targeted exposure. We discuss their shortcomings, and then provide some basic alternatives and refinements that do not require special macros or programming. Throughout, we assume the main goal is to derive the most accurate effect estimates obtainable from the data and commercial software. Allowing that most users must stay within standard software packages, this goal can be roughly approximated using basic methods to assess, and thereby minimize, mean squared error (MSE).
  • Identifier: ISSN: 0300-5771 ; E-ISSN: 1464-3685 ; DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyw040 ; PMCID: 4864881 ; PMID: 27097747